- 20 -
TAX IMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH REMOTE WORKERS
When a remote worker travels and works in different provinces, an employer must consider the
potential impact of the arrangement on the company’s tax liability, compliance obligations, and
withholding and remittance obligations for employee remuneration.
Provincial corporate and health tax implications
Having employees work remotely in different provinces can affect the tax the employer pays, its
access to specific provincial tax benefits, and its filing obligations in different provinces.
Canadian resident corporations are subject to separate income taxes levied by the federal
government and the provinces. While the federal portion of income tax is the same for all
corporations, the income attributable to each province is subject to varying rates. Canadian-
resident corporations are generally subject to tax on active business income at combined federal
and provincial tax rates ranging from 23% (Alberta) to 31% (Prince Edward Island). Canadian-
controlled private corporations may be eligible for the small business deduction on active
business income up to a limit, for combined federal and provincial tax rates ranging from 9%
(Manitoba, Saskatchewan) to 12.2% (Ontario, Quebec). Provinces also have different tax
calculation rules and provide incentives and tax credits that apply only to income attributable to
the province.
While all provinces legislate their corporate tax regimes and rates, the Canada Revenue Agency
(“CRA”) administers corporate provincial tax for each province except Quebec and Alberta.
Corporations file an annual return with the CRA for the federal portion and activities in all
provinces other than Quebec or Alberta. Separate provincial returns may also need to be filed in
Quebec or Alberta if the corporation has activities in those jurisdictions.
A corporation’s active business income may be taxable in any given province if the corporation has
a permanent establishment (“PE”) in that province. Whether a corporation has a PE in a particular
province is a question of fact, determined under the detailed legislation and deeming rule
framework in the Income Tax Act (Canada) (“ITA”) and the Income Tax Regulations (“ITR”).
As remote work has become significantly more common, concern has arisen that a home office
could constitute a PE in a province where an employer did not otherwise have a PE. The answer
in any particular case depends on the work location, the employee’s authority to act on behalf of
the employer, and the extent of the employer’s other operations in the province. The CRA
recently stated that it may not consider an employee working from a home office in another
province to constitute a PE of the employer, provided that the employer does not otherwise carry
on business in that province. While helpful, this CRA statement does not replace the need to seek
tax advice for any particular situation.
Where a corporation has a PE in multiple provinces, its taxable income is allocated among the
provinces. The ITA and ITR provide rules for allocating provincial income, but these do not
address all situations, particularly in a modern and changing world. The CRA has developed
administrative positions on issues that could apply to various situations. However, as with all
CRA interpretations, the guidance is not legally binding and is subject to change.